Artificial trees as a cavity substrate for woodpeckers
-
Published source details
Peterson A.W. & Grubb T.C. (1983) Artificial trees as a cavity substrate for woodpeckers. Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 790-798.
Published source details Peterson A.W. & Grubb T.C. (1983) Artificial trees as a cavity substrate for woodpeckers. Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 790-798.
Actions
This study is summarised as evidence for the following.
Action | Category | |
---|---|---|
Provide artificial nesting sites for woodpeckers Action Link |
||
Provide artificial nesting sites for songbirds Action Link |
-
Provide artificial nesting sites for woodpeckers
A replicated trial in 1979-80 in a deciduous forest in Ohio, USA (Peterson & Grubb 1983), found that downy woodpeckers Picoides pubescens excavated 51 roosting cavities in 42 artificial snags. Raccoons Procyon lotor destroyed 18 cavities, with woodpeckers excavating new holes near nine of these. Two species of songbird used cavities excavated by woodpeckers (see ‘Provide artificial nesting sites for songbirds’ for details). Snags were polystyrene cylinders 242 cm high, 22 cm diameter and were erected 10 cm above ground on metal poles. A total of 50 cylinders were erected. Laboratory tests showed that polystyrene did not have a negative impact on woodpecker health.
-
Provide artificial nesting sites for songbirds
A replicated trial in 1979-80 in a deciduous forest in Ohio, USA (Peterson & Grubb 1983), found that two pairs of Carolina chickadees Parus carolinensis and 28 pairs of house wrens Troglodytes aedon nested in cavities excavated from polystyrene cylinders by downy woodpeckers Picoides pubsecens. This study is discussed in more detail in ‘Provide artificial nesting sites for woodpeckers’.
Output references
|