Conservation Evidence: Evidence Data

Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Ponto-Caspian gobies: Increasing carbon dioxide concentrations No evidence was captured on the use of carbon dioxide for management of invasive Ponto-Caspian gobies. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1070https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1070Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:23:27 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Ponto-Caspian gobies: UV radiation No evidence was captured on the use of UV radiation to control goby populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1071https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1071Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:24:45 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Ponto-Caspian gobies: Changing pH No evidence was captured on the use of pH alteration to control goby populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action.Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1073https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1073Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:28:33 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Ponto-Caspian gobies: Public education No evidence was captured on the impact of education programmes on control of goby populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1075https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1075Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:32:09 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Biological control of beneficial species No evidence was found for reducing or controlling bullhead population size by reducing the population of co-occurring beneficial species. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1076https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1076Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:59:42 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Habitat manipulation No evidence was captured on the impact of habitat manipulation on invasive bullhead populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1077https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1077Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:02:26 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Draining invaded waterbodies No evidence was found for use of draining invaded waterbodies to reduce the population size of invasive bullheads. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1078https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1078Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:03:40 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Electrofishing No evidence was found for use of electrofishing to reduce the population size of invasive bullheads. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1079https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1079Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:05:15 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Using a combination of netting and electrofishing No evidence was captured on the impact of electrofishing and gill netting combined on bullhead populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1080https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1080Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:08:24 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Trapping using sound or pheromonal lures No evidence has been found for the effectiveness of trapping bullheads using sound or pheromonal lures. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1081https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1081Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:09:55 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Increasing carbon dioxide concentrations No evidence was captured on the use of carbon dioxide for management of invasive bullheads. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1082https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1082Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:11:25 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: UV radiation No evidence was captured on the impact of UV radiation on bullhead populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1083https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1083Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:12:37 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Changing salinity No evidence was captured on the impact of changing salinity on bullhead populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1084https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1084Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:13:42 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Changing pH No evidence was captured on the impact of altering pH on bullhead populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1085https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1085Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:14:53 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Brown and black bullheads: Public education No evidence was captured on the impact of education programmes on invasive bullhead populations. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1086https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1086Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:15:46 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Ponto-Caspian gammarids: Biological control using predatory fish No evidence was captured for the use of predatory fish to control Ponto-Caspian gammarids. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1087https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1087Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:23:09 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Ponto-Caspian gammarids: Exposure to disease-causing organisms No evidence was captured for the use of disease-causing organisms to control Ponto-Caspian gammarids. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1090https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1090Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:31:55 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Ponto-Caspian gammarids: Cleaning equipment No evidence was captured for the cleaning of equipment to control Ponto-Caspian gammarids. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1096https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1096Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:49:53 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Ponto-Caspian gammarids: Exchanging ballast water No evidence was captured for exchanging ballast water to control Ponto-Caspian gammarids. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1097https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1097Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:51:28 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Skunk cabbage: Biological control using co-evolved, host specific herbivores No evidence was captured on biological control of skunk cabbage using co-evolved, host specific herbivores. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1098https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1098Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:05:44 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Skunk cabbage: Biological control using native herbivores No evidence was captured on biological control of skunk cabbage using native herbivores. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1099https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1099Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:07:24 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Skunk cabbage: Biological control using fungal-based herbicides No evidence was captured on biological control of skunk cabbage using fungal-based herbicides. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1100https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1100Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:08:29 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Skunk cabbage: Combination treatment using herbicides and physical removal No evidence was found for use of combination treatment using herbicides and physical removal to control skunk cabbage. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1103https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1103Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:27:15 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Skunk cabbage: Use of hydrogen peroxide No evidence was found for use of hydrogen peroxide to control skunk cabbage. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1104https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1104Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:28:18 +0100Collected Evidence: Collected Evidence: Skunk cabbage: Use of liquid nitrogen No evidence was found for use of liquid nitrogen to control skunk cabbage. 'No evidence' for an action means we have not yet found any studies that directly and quantitatively tested this action during our systematic journal and report searches. Therefore we have been unable to assess whether or not the action is effective or has any harmful impacts. Please get in touch if you know of such a study for this action. Collected Evidencehttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1105https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservationevidence.com%2Factions%2F1105Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:29:18 +0100